6.
is justified in accepting the risk of spreading this
item of expenditure over two years. I shall be most
grateful for your advice on this point.
11.
41
Very slight provision has been made for
protective clothing for the Essential Services. Taking into combined consideration the presumed improbability
of mustard gas attacks, the probable short life of such
material, the fact that even a physically fit man cannot
endure such clothing for more than half an hour in this
climate, and the high cost entailed I am of the opinion
that the most that should be done is to equip and train
a few small mobile bodies of men for decontamination
work and that no attempt should be made so to clothe
all the personnel of the Essential Services.
12.
You will also observe that there is no
provision for respirators for the general public. It
must, I fear, be taken as certain that it would not be
possible to train the great majority of the local urban
population in the use of these respirators. That
majority consists of deeply ignorant persons, is for the
most part of a fluctuating character and lives in densely
crowded slums. On the other hand there are large numbers
of European and Asiatic race who would be prepared to buy
respirators at cost price and I propose in due course to
make arrangements accordingly: this, however, should
cost the tax payer nothing as cost price will include
storage cost. I can see no other solution of this
problem of providing respirators for the general public:
if free distribution were to be undertaken it would be
necessary to provide for the whole population, a very
expensive operation and a waste of money so far as the
greater number are concerned: on the other hand I fail
to see how a line could be drawn between those to be
given respirators free of charge and those to be refused.
13.
There remains for consideration the
6
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.